RESOLUTION ON THE SETHUSAMUDRAM SHIP CANAL PROJECT, GULF OF MANNAR & PALK BAY, INDIA AND SRI LANKA

RESOLUTION ON THE SETHUSAMUDRAM SHIP CANAL PROJECT, GULF OF MANNAR & PALK BAY, INDIA AND SRI LANKA

http://www.sangam.org/articles/view2/print.php?uid=677

Adopted by the Fifth Meeting of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and
Management of Marine Turtles and their Habitats of the Indian Ocean and South-East Asia (Bali, 20-23 August 2008)

Recognizing that the waters of the Gulf of Mannar, including Palk Strait, Palk Bay, and Adam’s Bridge, provide critical habitats such as extensive seagrass beds and coral reefs which support regionally important concentrations of endangered and threatened migratory marine wildlife, including four species of marine turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea, Caretta caretta, Eretmochelys imbricata, Chelonia mydas, Marine Mammals such as Dugong (Dugong dugong), Sperm Whale (Physeter macrocephalus), Blue Whale (Balaenoptera musculus), Fin Whale (Balaenoptera physalus), Sei Whale (Balaenoptera borealis), Bryde's Whale (Balaenoptera edeni), Short-finned Pilot Whale (Globicephala macro), Indo-Pacific Humpback Dolphin (Sousa chinensis), Striped Dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba), Spinner Dolphin (Stenella longirostris),Common Dolphin (Delphinus delphis), Bottle-nosed Dolphin (Tursiops truncates), False Killer Whale Pseudorca crassidens,- Whale Shark, (Rhincodon typus) and birds – Spot billed pelican, Oriental darter, Lesser flamingo, White ibis and Painted stork.

(Bird List from Dr. Balachander of the Bombay Natural History Society who is based in the region- these are near threatened IUCN status)

Ceteaceans in Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar (From “A Catalogue of Indian Marine Mammal Records” by Kumaran Sathasivam 2004)

Acknowledging that this project area has unique historic, cultural and economic importance to the people from India and Sri Lanka, in addition to providing essential living marine resources for more than 500,000 fishersfolk in India and Sri Lanka;

Concerned that the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP), will involve dredging and maintaining a 89 km long channel, which will be 300 meters wide and 12 meters deep in 3 segments across the Gulf of Mannar to allow passage of ships up to 30,000 DWT which will unquestionably cause changes to the sediment flow, oceanographic parameters, nutrient cycles and irreversible damage to critical marine habitats, endangered and migratory species, within the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay. The globally significant and endemic species of this biodiverse region stands threatened.

Conscious that the proposed project will be within 6km of India's first and largest Biosphere Reserve, which is internationally recognized within the framework of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme.

Recalling that Biosphere Reserves are nominated by national governments under the UNESCO's MAB Programme to “reduce biodiversity loss; improve livelihoods and enhance social, economic and cultural conditions for environmental sustainability”.

Aware that various documents fundamental for the justification of the SSCP, such as the EIA report, Detailed Project Report, Technical Feasibility and the Economic Analysis report, have been criticised by several experts in environmental science, earth sciences, oceanography, geology, naval hydrography, marine biology, environmental policy, law, economics, and maritime navigation who have concluded that the environmental and social impacts on the biodiversity of the region, including endangered or threatened migratory species and their habitats as well as the financial viability of the project have not been adequately assessed or predicted.

Further acknowledging that analyses of the project by economic, shipping and marine navigation experts conclude that previous cost-benefit analyses and financial feasibility studies have not adequately or accurately forecast the costs to potential SSCP users, thereby questioning the project’s economic viability;

Concerned that this project will have severe, deleterious impacts on the above mentioned endangered and threatened migratory species and their habitats, local marine and coastal biodiversity, fisheries and marine related livelihoods of communities in the region of Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar;

Recognizing the strong public opinion and opposition against this project from local fisher communities as well as civil society due to its implications on the environment, ecology and the local livelihood as articulated in the prayers of the petitions being heard in the Supreme Court of India [Special Leave Petitions (SLP) (Civil) Nos. 19176 of 2005 and SLP (Civil) 20758 of 2005];

The Signatory States to the IOSEA Marine Turtle Memorandum of Understanding

Urge that a comprehensive regional environmental impact assessment study be carried out by an independent agency to determine the likely impacts of the project on the environment within the contiguous marine and terrestrial territories of India and Sri Lanka, including all endangered and threatened migratory species and their habitats, and a report prepared for public consultation in India, Sri Lanka, and other States likely to be affected before any further construction activities related to the SSCP are taken forward;

Urge that a comprehensive and independent economic and financial feasibility analysis be carried out by an independent agency any further construction activities related to the SSCP are taken forward;

Urge that these analyses take into account views and opinions of various relevant inter-governmental bodies and agencies, including, but not limited to, CMS, UNESCO, UNEP, FAO and IMO, and also take into account written statements from various community institutions (such as village committees, traditional panchayats and gram panchayats) of each coastal village in the area of influence on the project;

Urge that the above documents are translated into the local languages and disseminated to communities and civil society for public consultation and for the purpose of conducting fresh public hearings in India and Sri Lanka on the SSCP to assess the full environmental and economic implications of the project.

Dear all,

Please find the above draft resolution on proposed Sethusamudram Canal which will be adopted by the Fifth Meeting of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of Marine Turtles and their Habitats of the Indian Ocean and South-East Asia (Bali, 20-23 August 2008). For Sri Lankan conservationists and politicians, this document may be with great importance.

Kind regards

Thushan Kapurusinghe
Project Leader - Turtle Conservation Project (TCP)
Marine Turtle Specialist - IUCN/SSC-MTSG

end:

Tamils For Justice fully supports the Turtle Conservation Project (TCP), and other environmental protection endeavors of the Sri Lankan NGO's and Non Profit Organizations. The Colombo based Sinhalese politicians from all parties have ignored the SSC Project due to ignorance, and incompetency except the late Tamil foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar who comprehended the environmental dangers and gave proper advise to the then President Chandrika Bandaranayake Kumaratunge and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse in 2005. However, both these individuals in their assumed infinite wisdom chose to ignore such good advise, as well as the FM's position on Conversion Bill which was pushed and lobbied by the Sinhala Buddhist privately assisted by none other than the Foreign Minister's own wife Suganthi Kadirgamar.

Lakshman Kadirgamar angered and earned the wrath of India and RAW, on his opposition to the Sethu Samudram Canal Project, leading to even the written warning from RAW or the South block to the defense Secretary Major General Asoka Jayawardene, in July 2005, who passed it on to the Foreign Minister and his wife. Suganthi's brother in law Colonel Sarath Jayawardene was in charge of the foreign minister's security although he was working for the Island/Upali group as a retired army Colonel.

LTTE showed serious concerns of the Sethu Samudran Canal project and was working with the Jaffna University professors some of whom have been compromised and influenced by the Indians. This included a former Vice Chancellor who retired and was offered a lucrative contract in South India.

http://www.island.lk/2005/08/29/index.htm (Picture of Jayantha Gnanakone at the Colombo demonstration)

http://www.island.lk/2005/08/29/news2.html

The journalist of Island newspaper was none other than the current Hon. Consul in Toronto,
Bandula jayasekera, who is a well known boot licker of the Rajapakse brothers.

Main eye witness still not questioned
Kadirgamar assassination probe
Army and police playing ping pong
by Bandula Jayasekara

The Army has begun to question the line taken by the police in their investigations into the assassination of Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar on Friday August 12, by the LTTE. They believe that the police are trying to blame them for the security lapses discovered after the killing.

Sources said the task of guarding the late minister’s private residence had been entrusted to the Ministerial Security Division (MSD). The late Minister had, on February 21, 2001, in a three-page letter, clearly said that security at his personal residence had to be taken care of by the MSD. His private residence was at Havelock place then, thereafter he had informed the police of the change of residence to No, 36 Bullers Lane.

Sources said only two MSD personnel had been present near the front gate of the minister’s residence at the time of the assassination. Sources said that according to reports, the assassin had waited at the Thalaysingham residence for about three to four days. They asked what the MSD had done all that time. They said the army went only as an advance party.

Sources said that Mrs. Kadirgamar had earlier, on several occasions complained to the Police about the duties and functions of the MSD personnel.

"It is surprising why the CID is yet to question Mrs. Kadirgamar, who was there with the late minister, when he was shot by the LTTE. Why are they trying to cover up their follies?" asked sources.

The CID had questioned over 25 Army Commandos but not the only eyewitness, Mrs. Kadirgamar.

Sources revealed that they had seen a clear pattern emerging from the Police investigations and their questioning. That was that the police were trying to place the blame on the Army. At one point an angry Commando had to walk out because the CID had directly blamed the Army.

Sources revealed that the late minister had spoken to IGP Chandra Fernando personally and asked for a report on the LTTE men caught videoing his Bullers Lane residence three weeks before he was killed. The IGP had sent the minister two photos of the LTTE suspects with their personal details.

But no action had been taken apart from the provision of this information, sources said.

Questions have also arisen over whether the NIB was aware of the arrest of the LTTE spies and that the minister had topped the LTTE hit list.

end:

Credit to the Island reporter BANDULA JAYASEKERA who had accurately reported about the lady in the home at 36 Bullers Lane, when the assassination took place, as one of the army commandos leaked that information. That explained why there was a delay in cordon and search of the neighbors residence, including the home of Lakshman Thalayasingam, from where the shots were fired, by the assassins, suspected to be former LTTE rebels. That id why there are NO real suspects after 3 years.

Both Bandula Jayasekera and Editor of the Island have stonewalled information about the "lady in the house" since Mrs Suganthi Kadirgamar was knitting at home in McCarthy road, and watching TV.

http://www.island.lk/2005/08/29/news1.html

http://www.tamilweek.com/Charles_Gnanakone_detention_1023.html

Tamils For Justice.org

Tamils For Justice :

Jayantha Gnanakone

Founder: